FOOTPRINT

Delft Architecture Theory Journal

Announcements

 

New issue published: Footprint 21 published

 

Footprint 21 is out now. This issue, edited by Robert Alexander Gorny and Dirk van den Heuvel is dedicated to the theme "Trans-Bodies / Queering Spaces".

This issue of Footprint looks into the latest developments in queer theory and the related, newly emerging field of trans studies, and how they might inform and even reconceptualise architecture.

 
Posted: 2018-01-09 More...
 
More Announcements...

Issue # 21 | Autumn / Winter 2017 | Trans-Bodies / Queering Spaces

This issue of Footprint looks into the latest developments in queer theory and the related, newly emerging field of trans studies, and how they might inform and even reconceptualise architecture. Even though the introduction of queer theory into architecture dates back to the 1990s, there is still fairly little literature available specific to architecture. Most contemporary research into queer and trans theory happens in the fields of cultural studies, literature and the arts and social geography, whereas a cross-disciplinary connection between architecture, urban design and queer theory seems only logical from the point of view that architecture and urban design are instrumental in the formation of social and political identities. Additionally, queer and trans theory offers the possibility of opening up the disciplinary straightjacket of architecture: it engenders a radical reconceptualisation of the architectural discipline and its institutions in that queer and trans theory unsettles any conception of architecture as an embodiment of essentialist categories, be it identities, forms and types, just as it disturbs the mythologies of authorship and autonomy. Concerned with radical inclusiveness, this issue proposes to use ‘queering’ and ‘transing’ as lenses to more generally critique ‘exclusive’ conceptions of architecture, as well as mutually exclusive container concepts of spaces and bodies. What could architecture do, if we would leave behind essentialist approaches? Would it be possible to ‘undo’ the body of architecture and architecture theory and to allow for new figurations of knowledge, to ‘queer’ our understanding of architecture as a field engaged in consistent transformation, the material interface of processes of becoming?

Full Issue

View or download the full issue View Issue

Table of Contents

Editorial

Robert Alexander Gorny, Dirk van den Heuvel
1-10

Article

Xenia Kokoula
11-24
Athina Angelopoulou
25-50
Tim Gough
51-66
Dan Snyder
67-86

Position

Andreas Angelidakis
87-94
Colin Ripley
95-108
Joel Sanders
109-118

Interview

Brady Burroughs, Katatrina Bonnevier, Hélène Frichot, Katja Grillner
119-128